Notifications
Clear all

L542 LED conversion


Roger King
(@roger-king)
Reputable Member Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 372
Topic starter  

On the way back from viewing a very nice Aceca a couple of weeks ago, I saw a white Healey 3000 in a layby which had sustained significant rear three-quarter damage from a 'rear-ending'.  This turned out to be someone heading for Oakham to partake in the following day's Prologue Tour, for which we had entered the Cooper 'S', so I got to chat to him about it.  Someone apparently just drove into the back of him, with no clue why - he was now in a hire car, but had been quoted over £20k for the repairs (the centre section, or 'shroud', of a Healey's body is aluminium).

I had noticed that the damaged car was a pre-'64 Healey, with single red taillamp on each side and using a DB10 relay in the same manner as the leafspring Cobras.  This is the third Healey I've seen that's been rear-ended in this way, and was enough to make me decide to forsake originality in this one area and go for a conversion to amber indicators.  I did buy a set of Spiyda's L542 LED conversions a while back, when Paul first was involved with them - but chose not to fit them, as having followed cars fitted with them I was concerned about the relative invisibility of the indicators* when the brake lights were illuminated.  I reasoned that the flashing red indicator with the brake light extinguished by the DB10 gave clearer indication of my intentions.

Chris had a Spiyda stand at the NEC Restoration show in March, and generation 3 (or4) of the L542 kit was on display.  It was so bright it was truly painful to look at indoors, so I thought I'd give them a go.  They're now installed, which was so easy it defies description.  The set is beautifully made and very robust.  I presume the layout is the same as the earlier models, with taillight and brakelight in the lower section and the indicator alone at the top.  The LEDs are arranged in a radial layout which kind of mimics a filament bulb, but now there seems to be much clearer definition between stoplamp and indicator when both are active.

The even better bit is that with everything else still filament-lit, there is still enough resistance to power the original bimetallic-strip flasher can.  The electronic replacements are nasty black plastic boxes (although bettercarlighting makes one in a plain, longer than original aluminium can).  However this is a very visible component on a Cobra, so it's nice to be able to use my correctly-date-stamped Lucas period original can with the LED rears.

 

* Probably just my aging eyesight...

The Cobra Register - Historian
Several old bangers, which used to include a 289
fbhvc.co.uk
thesahb.com


Quote
Paul Blore
(@paul-blore)
Reputable Member Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 398
 

Hi Roger,

Did you use the original discount code I gave you?  Chris should still have honoured it.  

He may have put even brighter LED's in, but the layout sounds the same with the radial arrangement of the yellow LED's. Another benefit of them is that there is nothing exposed to the under-arch environment as they're flat and sealed at the back.

Paul

The Cobra Register - CEO


ReplyQuote
Roger King
(@roger-king)
Reputable Member Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 372
Topic starter  

Hi Paul, I know Chris of old and had no problems with the price.  He has previous with hot Minis (and I mean hot).

Under-arch environment?  My lamps are as original, contained within the boot space.

The Cobra Register - Historian
Several old bangers, which used to include a 289
fbhvc.co.uk
thesahb.com


ReplyQuote
Paul Blore
(@paul-blore)
Reputable Member Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 398
 

I was forgetting that the 289’s had the rear of the lights inside the boot. The 427 S/C had them in the cavity behind the rear wheel arch panel. This is probably due to the big fuel tank extending out and up into said cavity.

Paul

The Cobra Register - CEO


ReplyQuote
David Beck
(@webmaster)
Estimable Member Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 102
 

My discussions with Sarah leave me intelligently bereft and wishing I paid more attention at school 🤡 

The Cobra Register - Founder Member


ReplyQuote
Roger King
(@roger-king)
Reputable Member Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 372
Topic starter  

That's how Kirkham build the 289s as well - I had to completely redesign all the interior panelwork in my car's body to get this right.  Doing this allowed me to get all the other 'improvements' corrected as far as was possible, too - including the wooden wedges under the floor panels and the wooden fillet across the top of the transmission tunnel/front bulkhead that compensates for the thickness of the glassfibre footboxes.  This is one reason why I am reluctant to describe my car as a Kirkham - I like to think it's a bit more than that.

Cobra 155
Cobra 156

I'd be interested to see inside an original 427 bootspace.  The best a quick search throws up is CSX3040:

CSX3040

...which compares with the 289:

Cobra 266

I think it's just ease of construction as the fuel tank doesn't get that far back.  The wider track helps with the space a fair bit, but I can see why a spare is problematic!

Edit - just twigged, of course the tank is in the floor in a SC.  

The Cobra Register - Historian
Several old bangers, which used to include a 289
fbhvc.co.uk
thesahb.com


ReplyQuote
Paul Blore
(@paul-blore)
Reputable Member Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 398
 

CSX3040 is a 427 S/C and the side panels in a 427 S/C boot are inboard of the rear lights, so the lights can't be accessed from within the boot.

The fuel tank on 427's is under the boot floor and on S/C's the tank extends further to each side and also up into the rear wings. Road 427's had a white GRP boot floor similar to the 289 and small hatches each side to access teh rear lights.

Paul

The Cobra Register - CEO


ReplyQuote
Share: